You used summary executions to break the resistance of the people.
Substantive, plurally sum-ma-ries. a complete and usually brief summary, recap or composite of the aforementioned facts or assertions. brief and succinct; brief and succinct; immediate and immediate; quick as a flash: to deal with someone with summary mail. Summary, abbreviated form, summary, summary are words for a brief description of a longer work. The summary is a brief explanation or reformulation of the most important points, especially at the end of a work: a summary of a section.
Digests are a summary of an articles, a novel etc. or an organised array of materials under headings and titles: a Digest of a famous novel; a digest of Latin right. As a rule, a syopsis is a condensed representation of the story of a novel, theatre piece, etc.: a Hamlet SYMPS.
You' ve created a summary of the story and then zoomed in on it. It had not expected to be discussed in this summary. Summarizing a lecture given by the group is a test of the efficiency of the teaching. Every pupil should be asked about his or her readings or give a summary of them.
An example of the earnings difference is a summary of the 1911 figures. adj. beginning of 15 c. from the Middle Ages summary "of or relating to the total or substance", from the Roman total "whole, gist" (see total). At first, the substantive, which means "a summary or an account", is taken up around 1500, from the Roman summary "an embodiment, abstractly, summary", from the summary "totality, core".
Abstract is essential in the preparation and creation of an argument. If you are summarising (or describing) a text, distil the idea of another resource for use in your own work. The summary of primarysources allows you to keep an overview of your own findings. This will help to make your analyses of these resources persuasive, because they are founded on carefully observing the facts and not on blurred or imprecise memories.
However, it is important to recall that the aim of an analytic essays is only partially to show that one knows and can summarise the work of others. It is the larger job to present your own idea, your own analyses of the raw materials. So, all shapes of summary (there are several) utilities should be in your paper and not its totality.
The real summary always summarizes the principal point and the most important support points of an analytic resource, the entire sheet and the most important turns of a story or the principal theme and the principal characteristics of a visible one. Genuine summary does not quote and judge the resource, but concentrates on giving a fairly accurate view of it.
A real summary can also represent the previous work in an area; it summarizes the story of this work as a narration. Think about whether you want to insert a real summary - often only a few phrases, seldom more than one section - in your article when you insert a new one. Shortly after his introductory remarks to an essays on Whittaker Chambers, a pivotal figure at the beginning of the Cold War, Bradley Nash contained four movements summarising the preface to his major resource, Chambers' work.
In the first two movements of the preface, he characterises the style and sound, before quickly depicting the motion of his notions: Nash's first two movements: Each article also needs excerpts of a real summary on the way to "orienting" the reader - to present them to the personalities or to those who have not yet encountered them, to remember things they need to remember in order to comprehend their point of view.
Pronounced sentence in the section that introduces Nash's summary is an example of indicative information. Genuine summary is also necessary to provide a framework for your needs, the framework you are creating in your intro. For example, an essays on the "useful past" of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial could begin by briefly summarising the story of the notion of a useful past or summarising the point of views of a prominent theoretician on the subject.
This summary comes from an essays in which a civil war picture is examined in the limelight of Lincoln's Gettysburg address. Thus she unveiled the point of her depiction in a couple of thematic lines (fixed underscore), summarised the photographic detail (double underscore) and gave the depiction an interpretative "spin" (throughout).
Trossel's Haus, Battle-Field of Gettysburg, July 1863 Alexander Gardner's photography could therefore be seen more as proof than as a comment. Photography's compositions could hardly be more prose, the horizontal halves the image, and the motif, a beloved building in the middle. On the first sight the photo seems to be a likeness of a building, perhaps even a bad likeness of a building; in a "sketchbook" of the conflict one could leaf directly past it to the bloody images before and after.
However, the horror in this photo is in its belated shocking, heartbreaking astonishment when the lights on the building lead the eyes to the lights on the gate and the observer realizes that the courtyard is shattered, and then that the courtyard is a confusion dotted with - what is that?
We see only one building, a busted railing, twelve deceased ponies and an empty canopy. Keep in mind that an article that is arguing (and not just describing) will only use the summary economically to regularly alert the reader to important points. The summary should always help to construct your case. Usually when a teacher writes "too much summary - more needs analysis" in the margins, they think that the paper is more about what you have been studying than discussing something about it.
Forced by a message of the apparent, a further explanation leading to the second issue, a tree that either follows the timeline of the code from beginning to end or just gives a list of samples from the well.