Non Democratic Country Myanmar

Non-democratic country Myanmar

In an undemocratic country, what difficulties do the people have? In an undemocratic country, people have various difficulties, as we have seen in Chile, Myanmar, Ghana, Pakistan, Poland, Nepal and so on. State and non-governmental groups were included in the use. Burma and Turkmenistan are the last dead. " Aung San Suu Kyi on non-violence.

So what is a non-democratic state?

An undemocratic state is a refionale area in which the electorate is not permitted to elect. These are the four types of governance. Fifth can or cannot be regarded as a kind is a tyrannic rule, the kingdom is governed by a sovereign. If there is a potential for all other types of governance, a sovereign state will be governed without a sovereign.

There are many states of communism and some socialism that can be regarded as such. It is a country governed by the population. The Greek demos means human being. Bullying is governed by power or violence. Dictatorial areas can be regarded as tyrannic.

Myanmar's political transition

Myanmar's policy change is celebrated by foreign policymakers, specific interests and its mass media as" historic" and a new beginning for "democracy" in the South East Asian people. But even before the Aung San Suu Kyi led the democratic parties, the facts disagreed with the fictions of the West's leaders and experts who had worked for many years.

Prior to the election, worldwide consciousness grew of Suu Kyi's refusal to denounce the country's Rohingya population. Article like "Why is Aung San Suu Kyi not talking about the Rohingya's distress? There has also been a heightened sense that some of Suu Kyi's most loyal followers were directly implicated and led the violent attacks on the Rohingya.

In spite of efforts to present these followers as "opponents" of Suu Kyi and her current faction, it is already clear that Suu Kyi is rewards them by focusing on their foes and permitting them to yield more frankly to their force after they are in office. Following the election, Suu Kyi was expelled from the EU because of her many links to overseas interests, which included her earlier marriages with a female alien and her alien-no less British-citizenship child, who was Britain's former-colonialist.

In spite of the prohibition, Suu Kyi undertook to "rule" the presidential election of a man she herself chose as her deputy. Aung San Suu Kyi in her piece "Aung San Suu Kyi is unlikely to take her place in Myanmar's government," tries to make an inexplicable explanation (stressing: The 15-year domestic democratic champ, who is the nation's ally, has sworn to stand "above the president" and fuel speculations about her part in the first democratic administration in more than five centuries.

But The Guardian never makes clear how an unrelected guide who swears to govern "over" an elect presidency, a "democratic champion" or the "first democratic elect in more than five decades". "It is clear that those who were voted for are not really taking over the leadership of the people, and instead of democracies Myanmar has been given a badly done, albeit insincere, representative.

Any such step towards illegal domination "over" the chosen presidency can only be construed as a breach of the democratic and constitutional state. Aung San Suu Kyi and her faction have chosen to obey these rules and rules when appropriate and beneficial, and to ride roughshod over them when they become obstruction.

These already worrying trends are reinforced by Suu Kyi's handling of those detained for her part. The West praises her for having released over 100 detainees - mostly her own foreign-funded backers - while she arrested and imprisoned her antagonists. In the Associated Press report "Myanmar liberates over 100 prisoner of conscience, but prison 2":

Over 100 Myanmar detainees were released under an apology ordered by the country's new de facto head Aung San Suu Kyi as the first act of office. Both are also Muslims, a group that has been under growing stress and force in recent years in predominantly Buddhist Myanmar.

There is no doubt that these two imprisoned detainees are only the beginning. In spite of efforts to portrait Suu Kyi's current faction and the hostile, racialist, bigoted indigenous "saffron" movements that she has supported as "hostile", the imprisonment and other legalization of repression and even genocide of the Rohingya and other "undesirables" is the strongest sign that such an accident does not yet occur.

Even before taking office, Suu Kyi, her current and current leaders and followers have treated enemies with the same level of tolerance and force that they reproached the military-led state. Aung San Suu Kyi's "saffron monks" routinely attack Rohingya communities and fugitive dwellings that commit genocide and torture, while the Myanmar ethnic groups' policy network of Myanmar Rohingya fight to deprive the few residual privileges they still have, while excluding attempts to give them full civic status, although many have been living in Myanmar for generation after generation.

Aung San Suu Kyi's apparent and spreading crime against the Myanmar tribe will only go on. Indeed, her party's politics, which go beyond the rhetoric of "democracy" and invite international companies to buy and run the land for her, is not politics. While the Myanmar population continues to face a period of unstable politics and economies, the resistance to Suu Kyi will increase and with it harassment and repression will increase.

Myanmar's only change has been the fact that it no longer associates itself primarily with its Asiatic neighbours, but rather with Wall Street, Washington, London and Brussels - the centres of government that have been financing Suu Kyi's movements and its various supporter for many years.

Myanmar's promises of "democracy" and "self-determination" over its mind are a pledge it will never keep as long as the Myanmar administration is committed to and represents the interests of foreigners, and not the interests of the nation for which it was supposedly "elected". Within a broader geo-political framework, Myanmar's conversion into a West Deputy has serious repercussions for the area, making it a destabilising turntable for its South East Asia neighbours and China.

Suu Kyi's already being found culpable or associated with blatant abuses of fundamental freedoms recorded by the West, but kept under lock and key, means that Suu Kyi should at all times lose her allegiance to her international supporters, as should the West's capacity to maintain her reputation as a "democracy champ.

Myanmar, like its rivals in Riyadh, another western country with its own horrors being used as extortion against them, is beginning this new phase in its colonisation, which is tied to the will of its former warlords. It is a 68-year regression for Myanmar.

Mehr zum Thema