Burma is also Called

Myanmar is also known as

Bama was also related to the largest sect of the Burmese people, Bamar or Bama. Aung San Suu Kyi's position was supported by the US and the UK, which until recently was called Burma. Friends of the junta in Asia called it Myanmar. "Myanmar, also known as Burma, was ruled by the world's oldest military dictatorship until two years ago. Burmese's third dialect is spoken by a small tribe called Yo.

Was Obama supposed to call it Burma or Myanmar? Practical guide

"In 1989, the army regime renamed the country'Myanmar'. It' s still the US politics to call the state Burma," the State Department website says (note: "When we look at the State Department website, we think of Hillary Clinton's vote that she is speaking, and that makes her even more serious). "Ben Rhodes, Deputy Federal Intelligence Advisor, said that Obama's use of Myanmar was'a kind of' polite diplomacy that does not alter the US view that the US is still Burma," a Fox News derailment reporter states.

as Burma." But, at the end of the afternoon, no matter how you might be feeling about Burma/Myanmar, we can all see eye to eye that Burma/Myanmar is saying to Obama: "The Golden Stupa" is the best there ever was?

What is it: Burma or Myanmar?

Burma in Myanmar in 1989 saw a change in the country's name, but global political leader has been taking it over slowly. So should it be Burma or Myanmar? "It is Burma and it is Myanmar. "It is still formally called Burma by the United States, although the country's government re-named it Myanmar about 20 years ago.

None of the two names was an excellent choice for Obama, who used a series of rhetoric such as "this amazing country". However, you probably cannot be the first US President-in-Office to go to a state without using that state's name at least once, and he did: Myanmar." "Myanmar, also known as Burma, was governed by the world's oldest army regime until two years ago.

During 2010, the army began to relax its influence on the land, strengthen civilian liberties and offer the people some sort of politic and economical opportunities.

Does Burma constitute China's satellite state? And the answer is yes

Thein Sein, a former general of the army and protege of the dictatorship of Snr Gen Than Shwe, is on a three-day state trip to China to make a official polite and courteous trip to Beijing for the rulers and to quickly consolidate the ties to a close alliance. Indeed, we should not ignore the historic relations between the two countries: in 1949 Burma was one of the first states to be recognised by the People's Republic of China.

Antichinean unrest was rife in Burma in 1967, while China in turn took an proactive part in assisting Burmese rebels. Let us not overlook the fact that Beijing has sometimes been hard on Burma's non-competent Burmese general, especially during the Kokang crisis in August 2009, when Beijing condemned Burma for being unstable at the shared borders, when some 37,000 people were fleeing into China.

According to reports, Beijing was angry and Burma quickly sent senior officers to repair the dig. China is playing a pivotal part in the question of trafficking and investing - the extraction of Burma's indigenous people. Xinhua last year said China has made massive capital expenditures in hydroelectric power, hydrocarbons and gases totalling $8.17 billion, based on the regime's own figures.

In fact, China's investments in Burma increased from $12.3 billion at the end of 2010 to $15.5 billion by the end of March this year. There' s no question that the Burmese China incursion is evident in the increasing number of Burmese immigrants and business people in Burma's second biggest town, Mandalay, and in Shan and Kachin states, where they have opened stores and stores and regularly buy landhold.

Over the past 20 years, it is estimated that several hundred thousand people from China have emigrated to Burma. China's continued Burmese footprint is significant - many Burmese locals have started to learn Mandarin to safeguard employment, leading to a practical jest in Burma that the country's prospective leaders will speak Mandarin fluently on their next trip to Beijing.

Soon after Burma's army defeated a pro-democracy move 22 years ago, China was one of the first neighbouring nations to provide weapons, fighter jets, navy vessels and munitions to help the recently established ruling regime. His steadfast backing for the Burma government has only increased since then. Prior to 1988, China had been supporting and financing Burma's rebels who fought a violent civilian conflict against the Myanmaris.

China's strategy for Burma is more practical than its earlier sluggish ideology. In fact, the change in politics unfortunately does nothing more than maintain the violent Burmese government and is playing a devastating part in the struggling Burmese democratic movements. Beyond Burma, Beijing's policies towards Naypyidaw have triggered a fierce discussion between pro-sanctions and anti-sanction groups.

Now is the right moment to argue against China's increasing economic and civic power in Burma. The present Burmese embassador to China, Li Junhua, said to Xinhua that Thein Sein's state trip would drive the bilateral co-operation between the two nations to a new high.

Burma's army chiefs often call China their "most important kind neighbour", and they can further expand their political ties with Beijing after the parliamentary elections in November. Myanmar has provided the Bengalese people with strategical entry into the Gulf of Bengal. This intensification of our strategy was first underlined by China's navy vessels in Burma's territorial seas last year.

They say: "Burma has fallen into China's lap because of the betrayer SuuKyi;..... Only a few pupils came from ONE Kemmendine, a recently state-owned Chineseschool. Mao could have sent weapons and men to various rebels in neighbouring nations to overthrow aggression. Myanmar was in a serious slump! In 1967 I was involved in the anti-Chinese unrest in Rangoon and I even recall some of my ethnic or semi- ethnic RASU (Rangoon Arts & Science University) classmates annoyed about how the CCP (under Mao-Tse-Tung) tried to bring the "Chinese Cultural Revolution" to Burma.

Burma control" 2. and they managed to do so thanks to Than Shwe, the stupid Tibetan tayoken pay min (king who gave the country away to the Chinese). Myanmar has fallen into China's lap because of the betrayer SuuKyi;SLORC and USDP had to take pragmatic and expedient action against English would-be British orthodox anti-Burmese advocacy.

When the NLD has a minimum of intelligence - not necessarily yours - Burma could make good and rapid headway. It is not right that Burma is being sanctioned in the hands of China," Tettoe Aung commented. In addition, the soldiers will tell you that they do not like the Chineses, China in some parts of Burma, its dependence on the economy and the China "economic invasion".

All this" civil government" and transitional democracy should also attract back Westers. Competing in the West with China investment means better pricing for the Myanmar population and more growth. As Tettoe Aung wrote: "It is not right that those who have said Burma is being held in China's hands by penalties.

The people who lived with me gave their life, not only their life, but that of their family, struggling against China's ideas with the help of the CPB (Burmese Communist Party). There is no respectful ness in the army for those who have given their life to go to sleep with the people. After all, the China PLA did not have to fire a bullet to invade Burma.

Apologets, representatives and even some goverments report that the new administration is making headway and the penalties are to be abolished. "Well, one thing is certain: those who let their emotions/hate determine their politics and attitudes will never make the least difference in Burma.

It is my view that a West face can be an advantage, and certainly more than the China population. Wunna Mg Lwin loudly called the UN almost every year that Burma would not allow anyone to affect it. Shwe and the group always bragged that they were great Tatmadaw-tha patriots, except that no one in Burma could shelter them.

Unfortunately, it is these general leaders who are handing Burma's domestic assets over to China. Worse still, they will have China occupied by the Burmese umbilical basis. Apologets, representatives and even some administrations report that the new administration is making headway and that the penalties are to be removed. Releasing all Zimbabwean detainees, carrying out the process of conciliation and building a true and unified democracy governed by DASSK are only means for Burma.

Than Shwe/Thein Sein has been in China's pockets for a long time. UWSA leaders Bao Youxiang and rebel forces have saved Burma's north frontier, while China's war ships are docking in Kyauk-hphyu, Arakan State, to defend China's interests in Burma. China is constructing railroads, streets, dams, pipes and mines in Burma, and even China military staff can be seen on the construction site in Burma.

Today, who protects Burma's sovereign nation and regional integration? Myanmar Army? Absolutely not, it's China silly! Is Myanmar a Chinese satellite state? How many in the rich Tatmadaw society/third parties therefore say should the US show its zeal for serious commitment with Myanmar's new administration and repeal or relax the penalties before the conditions are met, i.e. the freeing of policy detainees or the ending of atrocities?

Alternatively, she wants to reminds the democratic powers, especially the NLD, that there is a risk that the Chineses will strongly endorse NaypiDaw.... and she must upgrade and modifi? Burma is a customer state of China, I concur with Aung Zaw. Up until the sinking of the CPB, China was supporting the Red China in their fight against the government, yes.

Burma was then forced into China's hand because the West no longer wanted to interact with the government. Aung Zaw could at least have said that the Western sanction policy, which was partially the result of ASSK and the NLD asking for it, limited the government's choices.

As a consequence, Mandalay now feels like China..... It could take the DPRK out of the way, especially at a time like this, but it does not. If China were opposed, it would be impossible to believe that Burma and Korea could make sense in their trading.

For example, all embassies visit China so that China can compare their histories in time to keep up to date. China has been pursuing the idea for several centuries that if you go in a beautiful region, you will achieve a beautiful goal. Where does China think it is going with the Burmese/North Korea trading question?

Prior to colonizing Burma, the Brits had been in India for 100 years and had taken over more than half the state. Than Shwe, who thinks he is a sovereign, rules the state. But it is not the Brits who will colonize Burma this year.

This will be China, and unlike Britain's 100 years of domination, it will be lasting. Burma's 60 million people will be devoured by a billion Chinese. Loans to the so-called "patriotic" Myanmar Tatmadaw, who is the one who is going to sell the land to China. At the front, no land can be insulated on its own.

That is the only response, China and North Korea are becoming a Myanmar coalition to use our natural world. They have never been a settlement in a land that has been able to cut the minds of aliens, but they can throw them out at any moment and protect their privileges only for Thailand's people. You will find ways to move our land forward, not to sink even more.

Is Burma China's satellite state? Do you have any idea what could have happened if the army had said: "You don't really like the land"? It can be a relief that they at least say they really care about the land and not the people. In 1958, when the army took power for the first time, there was a joke: "We must be scared of who wears the pants, and that means female China.

I was in the 1967 anti-Chinese unrest in Rangoon and I even recall some of my ethnic or semi-ethnic RASU (Rangoon Arts & Science University) classmates who were annoyed by the CCP's attempt (under Mao-Tse-Tung) to bring the "Chinese Cultural Revolution" to Burma.

China has a different approach now, but the aim is the same: to take over Burma and they actually did it, thanks to Than Shwe, the stupid King of China who gave the land away to the people. It is too long now to get out of China's tough hold with all the Yuan and Y Chromosome (China has a glut of men) now buried in Burma, not to speak of all the enslaves who want to service their big brother-in-law for a fistful of Yuan.

My ancestral land is moral death. Hail Mian Dian, the new land of chopsticks! There are many people in China who do not know Burma who wear both China and Burma nationality badges travelling back and forth between China and Burma. In Burma, the Chinaman do what they want. Myanmar leadership bowing to China leadership.

Than Shwe's marionette administration does not merit being called a democracy-based one.

Mehr zum Thema